Accessibility Program

Enterprise Accessibility at Scale Through Governance & Inclusive Design

A governance-first accessibility program embedded inclusive design into planning, design, and QA. Enabling sustainable compliance, fewer defects, and faster, more consistent releases.

18%

fewer critical defects in the first six months

Accelerated

delivery timelines by reducing late-stage blockers

Scalable governance

model adopted enterprise-wide

Legal Disclosure:
Client identity and materials are anonymized. Metrics reflect representative outcomes. Request a confidential walkthrough

Overview

Context

The organization had no unified accessibility strategy. Accessibility was treated as an afterthought, adding cost and delays late in the delivery cycle. Vendors controlled implementation without clear standards, leading to inconsistent outcomes and compliance risk.

Challenge

  • No governance or ownership model for accessibility
  • Fragmented, reactive, and costly approaches
  • Vendors lacked contractual obligations to meet standards
  • Stakeholders viewed accessibility as expensive and time-consuming

Role

Design Operations & Accessibility Program Lead

  • Designed the enterprise-wide accessibility program strategy
  • Applied systems thinking to embed accessibility into governance, contracts, and workflows
  • Aligned cross-functional leaders (legal, regulatory, procurement, delivery)
  • Evangelized accessibility as an operational advantage, not a cost burden

Strategy & Execution

  • Governance-first model: Established clear standards, roles, and responsibilities for accessibility across all teams.
  • Cross-functional alignment: Partnered with legal, regulatory, procurement, and delivery leaders to embed accessibility into SOWs and approval workflows.
  • Process integration: Introduced checkpoints (design, QA, VPAT reviews) to catch issues early and reduce late-stage blockers.
  • Knowledge hub: Built self-service documentation, training, and KPI dashboards to scale accessibility practices.
  • Shift-left approach: Moved accessibility testing upstream to reduce costs and defects.
  • Evangelism: Ran training sessions, webinars, and updates to build awareness and sustain adoption.

Example: Regional Division Rollout

At the start, accessibility was pitched as a legal and ethical requirement, but this framing faced resistance, as teams saw it as a cost increase. By reframing accessibility as a way to reduce defects and accelerate delivery, leaders began to see operational value.

Working with procurement, legal, and regulatory teams, I helped rewrite vendor SOWs and approval workflows to include accessibility requirements by default. For example, vendors could no longer deliver code without documented accessibility compliance, and approval checkpoints required accessibility sign-off.

This shifted accessibility from a “nice-to-have” to a mandatory and scalable practice, built into contracts, processes, and team culture.

Outcomes

18%

reduction in defects in the first six months

Faster delivery

timelines by eliminating late-stage accessibility blockers

Improved vendor performance

through contractual obligations

Cultural shift:

accessibility treated as a shared responsibility, not an afterthought

FAQ

How do you share specifics under NDA?
I provide anonymized visuals and metrics. Detailed walkthroughs are available under NDA on a live call.
How did you get leadership buy-in?
By framing accessibility as an operational advantage, reducing costs, defects, and delivery risk,  not just a compliance issue..
How was success measured?
By reductions in workflow time, communication incidents, and adoption of UX processes across departments.
Is the approach transferable?
Yes. The same research-driven, service design methodology applies to any industry with complex workflows and fragmented tools.

Case Studies